🔗 Share this article

They describe themselves as the "emergency rescue team". Following losing their jobs when overseas aid underwent reductions in the past months, a collective of devoted staff chose to establish their own emergency initiative.

Refusing to "wallow in misery", Rob Rosenbaum, along with equally dedicated ex-colleagues, started actions to save some of the crucial initiatives that were threatened with termination after the reductions.

At present, nearly eighty programmes have been preserved by a connector platform managed by the economist and additional ex- aid staff, which has obtained them over $110m in recent backing. The collective behind the Pro initiative calculates it will benefit forty million people, covering many infants and toddlers.

After the termination of operations, spending was frozen, numerous staff lost their jobs, and global initiatives either came to a shuddering halt or were left limping toward what Rosenbaum calls "termination points".

Rosenbaum and some of his colleagues were approached by a charitable entity that "wanted to determine how they could make the best use of their finite budgets".

They created a menu from the cancelled projects, selecting those "providing the most vital support per dollar" and where a new funder could feasibly step in and maintain operations.

They quickly recognized the need was more extensive than that initial organization and started to contact further funding sources.

"We referred to ourselves as the emergency squad at the outset," explains Rosenbaum. "The organization has been sinking, and there aren't enough emergency options for all initiatives to be saved, and so we're attempting to literally save as many babies as we can, get as many on to these lifeboats as possible, via the programmes that are providing support."

Pro, now working as part of a international policy center, has obtained financial support for seventy-nine initiatives on its selection in in excess of 30 regions. Several have had prior support restored. Several others were not able to be saved in time.

Backing has originated from a blend of charitable organizations and affluent donors. The majority prefer to stay unnamed.

"The supporters stem from very different backgrounds and opinions, but the common thread that we've encountered from them is, 'People are shocked by what's going on. I sincerely wish to find a method to help,'" says Rosenbaum.

"I think that there was an 'eureka moment' for the entire team as we started working on this, that this provided an possibility to transition from the inactivity and despair, remaining in the gloom of everything that was happening around us, to having a meaningful task to really sink our teeth into."

One project that has found backing through the initiative is work by the Alliance for International Medical Action to provide services such as care for malnourished children, maternity services and crucial pediatric vaccinations in the West African nation.

It is crucial to maintain these operations, states the economist, not only because reinitiating work if they ceased would be extremely costly but also because of how much confidence would be forfeited in the zones of instability if the alliance withdrew.

"They shared […] 'there is fear that if we depart, we may be unable to return.'"

Programmes with longer-term goals, such as strengthening health systems, or in other fields such as learning, have been excluded from Pro's work. It also is not trying to save the projects indefinitely but to "buy time for the organizations and, honestly, the broader ecosystem, to figure out a longer-term solution".

After securing support for every initiative on its first selection, the team announces it will now prioritize helping additional individuals with "tested, efficient solutions".