🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have voted to withdraw from an global treaty designed to protect women from abuse, including family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the legislature.

Several thousand of demonstrators gathered in Riga this past week to oppose the decision. The final decision now lies with President the nation's president, who must decide whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last year, mandating governments to develop laws and assistance programs to end all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to initiate the process of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a move that rights groups described as a major setback for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was ratified by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its emphasis on equal rights weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Saeima, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a action proposed by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Political Divisions and Responses

One of the main parties supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be made political, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The recent vote has provoked broad outcry both within Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a Latvian petition demanding the convention to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a protest for the coming week, charging lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice fueled by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the treaty four years ago, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds majority, the president could possibly send back the bill for additional consideration if he holds objections.

President Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal principles, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, rather than ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in our nation but across Europe," stated a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse rates have been increasing in multiple European nations
• The European treaty mandates particular legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could affect comparable discussions in additional EU countries